The petitioner seeks to withdraw the Public Interest Lπ Petition. The court observes that instructions have been received to withdraw the same.
Petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sequeira
1 23 PIL 66 - 2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 12047 OF 2017
Rajendra Madhukar Thakur .. Petitioner Vs The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Mr.A.R.Deshpande i/b Mr.R.S.Deshpande, for the Petitioner.
Mr.P.P.Kakade, Government Pleader a/w Mr.M.M.Pabale - Additional Government Pleader, for Respondent-State.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N.M.JAMDAR, J. Date : 19 July, 2019.
P.C. :
Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that instructions have been received to withdraw the Public Interest Petition. The Petition is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Rajendra Madhukar Thakur
The State of Maharashtra
Pradeep Nandrajog
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
