Disposed
Vasant Ramrao Jogdand v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/33/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33.19pil
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.33 OF 2011
Shri. Vasant s/o Ramrao Jogdand ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr S. S. Thombre, Advocate for petitioner; Mr S. P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for respondent
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.
DATE : 11th October, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner prays for a week’s time to remove office objections.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
sjk
Shri. Vasant s/o Ramrao Jogdand
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
Prasanna B. Varale
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court