Dipak Kumar Chattopadhyay v. State of Maharashtra and 7 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged a University of Mumbai circular regarding external evaluation of law students. Petitioner sought to withdraw the PIL citing the Advocates Act; Court dismissed the petition as not pressed and disposed of pending applications as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Public Interest Litigation dismissed as not pressed; all pending applications disposed of as infructuous.