The Bombay High Court allowed an application restoring a writ petition, contingent upon the respondents removing office objections within two weeks, failing which the order would be withdrawn.
Application allowed; orders passed contingent on removal of office objections within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12191.19ca
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12191 OF 2019 IN REJECTED CASE NO. 997 OF 2019 IN
CONTEMPT PETITION (STAMP) NO.23012 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9097 OF 2018
Pratap S/o Ramrao More ...APPLICANT
VERSUS
Mr Asim Kumar Gupta & Ors.
....RESPONDENTS
Mr S. K. Patil, Advocate for applicant; Mr K. S. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent- State;
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND
AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.
DATE : 11th October, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Mr Patil, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant.
para Nos.3 and 4 of the application, the present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B), subject to removal of the office objections within a period of two weeks from today.
12191.19ca
(2)
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
sjk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present application is allowed
Whether orders are subject to removal of office objections within two weeks
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Pratap S/o Ramrao More
Mr Asim Kumar Gupta & Ors.
Prasanna B. Varale
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
