This PIL challenging the necessity of Aadhar cards was disposed of by the High Court of Bombay, following the Supreme Court judgment in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy regarding mandatory possession of the document.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
912.PIL-15-13.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.15 OF 2013
Vickram Crishna and Ors. … Petitioners versus Unique Identif i cation Authority of India and Anr. … Respondents
Mr.Mihir Joshi for the Petitioners.
Ms.Jyotsna Pandhi a/w Ms.Anusha Amin, Mr.Sandesh D. Patil for the Respondents.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I.CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE :- NOVEMBER 15, 2019
P.C. :-
Page 1 of 2
M.M.Salgaonkar
912.PIL-15-13.doc
(R.I.CHAGLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 (2019) 1 SCC 1
Page 2 of 2
M.M.Salgaonkar
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy and Anr. vs. Union of India and Ors.Followed¶15
Justice K.S.Puttaswamy (Retd) and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. (2019) 1 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
Vickram Crishna and Ors.
Unique Identification Authority of India and Anr.
S. C. Dharmadikari
R.I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
