Petitioners and advocates were absent. This court disposed of the PIL and writ petition, keeping the larger issue open for an appropriate future decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
911-PIL.116.2012+1.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 116 OF 2012
Shri. Agartad Shri. Shantinathji } Maharaj Jain Derasar Trust } Petitioner versus The Municipal Corporation of } Greater Mumbai and Ors. } Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1731 OF 2009
Shree Vardhaman Stanakvasi Jain } Shravak Sangh } Petitioner versus The Municipal Corporation of } Greater Mumbai and Ors. } Respondents
Mr.Vijay S. Sharma for the petitioner in PIL/116/2012absent.
M/s. Thakordas and Madgavkar for the petitioner in WP/1731/2009-absent.
Ms.K.H.Mastakar for the Municipal Corporation in both the matters.
Mr.Milind More-Additional Government Pleader for the State in PIL/116/2012.
Mr.S.B.Gore-AGP for State in WP/1731/2009.
Mr.N.R.Prajapati for the Union of India.
Mr.Sanmish Gala with Mr.Ankur Gala I/b. M/s.Makrand Gandhi and Co. for respondent no. 5 in WP/1731/2009 and for respondent no. 6 in PIL/116/2012.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & R. I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATED :- NOVEMBER 14, 2019
Page 1 of 2
J.V.SALUNKE,PS
911-PIL.116.2012+1.doc
P.C. :-
(R.I.CHAGLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
J.V.SALUNKE,PS
Maharaj Jain Derasar Trust
Shree Vardhaman Stanakvasi Jain Shravak Sangh
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
R. I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
