This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-PIL-26.2011.doc
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.26 OF 2011
Maharashtra State Teaching and Non Teaching Employees of Recognized Private Schools Mahasang, Branch at Solapur .... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Others .... Respondents
Mr. Saurabh Pakale i/by Mr. Shankar Katkar for the Petitioner. Smt. N.M. Mehra, AGP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 18, 2019
P.C:
The petitioner’s Advocate admits that for the grievances raised in the petition and the reliefs sought, a PIL can never be the remedy. It concerns the services of some teachers and the approval granted for the same. Such a cause is beyond the purview of a PIL. This litigation can never be styled as a PIL. It is disposed of.
(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Maharashtra State Teaching and Non Teaching Employees of Recognized Private Schools Mahasang, Branch at Solapur
State of Maharashtra & Others
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
R.I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
