The two-judge bench disposed of Public Interest Litigation No. 140 of 2009 and related civil applications, directing the petitioner to approach authorities regarding alleged illegal quarrying instead of pursuing the decade-old PIL.
The PIL was disposed of; related civil applications stood disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18-PILG-140.2009.doc
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.140 OF 2009
Pradip Chandrakant Indulkar .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Others .... Respondents
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NOS.99, 100, 101, 102 WITH 103 OF 2009 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.140 OF 2009
None present for the Petitioner. Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 5. Mr. Pritish Oak i/by Mr. A.A. Garge for Respondent No.4. Mr. Suresh M. Sabrad for the Applicant in all Applications.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 18, 2019
P.C:
Page 1 of 2
suresh 18-PILG-140.2009.doc
(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Pradip Chandrakant Indulkar
The State of Maharashtra
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
R.I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
