Partly allowed

Dilipkumar Subhash Jaiswal v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC21 Jan 2019APPR/28/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal application by an accused convicted under sections 465, 467, 468, 471 r/w 420 IPC sought suspension of conviction and bail pending revision. The High Court granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.15,000 with sureties and directed the appellant to appear on court dates. The matter was disposed of following a police report on address but allowing the application.

What did the court decide?

The applicant/accused was released on bail upon furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000 with one or two local sureties in the like amount and making himself available on all court dates. The Criminal Appl

Dilipkumar Subhash Jaiswal Vs the State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

Sherla V.

¶2

appr.28.2019_23.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.28 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.24 OF 2019

¶5

Shri Dilipkumar Subhash Jaiswal … Applicant

¶6

Vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶7

Mr.Ankush Dhokale I/b Keshav S. Chavan for the Applicant

¶8

Mr.Vinod Chate, APP, for the Respondent – State

¶9

CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

¶10

DATED: JANUARY 21, 2019

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

The Criminal Application is moved by the applicant/accused for suspension of the impugned judgement and conviction and also for bail pending the Criminal Revision Application. The applicant/accused was convicted for the offence punishable under sections 465, 467, 468, 471 r/w 420 of Indian Penal Code, by order dated 7.7.2015 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 16^th Court, Ballard Pier, in Case No.57/PW/06. The applicant was sentenced to suffer for different punishments however, the maximum punishment imposed was 2 years with fine.

¶13

Page 1 of 3

¶14

appr.28.2019_23.doc

¶15

The said order was challenged by way of Criminal Appeal No.678

¶16

of 2015, which was dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, by order dated 11.12.2018.

¶17

The learned Counsel for the applicant/accused submits the applicant/accused was on bail throughout the trial and appeal. He is taken in custody since 11.12.2018. He submits that the applicant/accused has a good case on merits. He is ready to furnish his residential address and will be available at the time of hearing of the revision.

¶18

Learned Prosecutor is present and opposed the application on the basis of the report dated 28.1.2019 by Senior Police Inspector of MRA Marg police station, Mumbai. He submits that the applicant/accused is residing at the address of his brother Dilipkumar Jaiswal at Lane No.3, Mankhurd, Mumbai.

¶19

In view of the submissions of the learned Counsel, the application is allowed on the following terms:

¶20

ii) The applicant/accused shall be released on bail upon furnishing a P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two local sureties in the like amount;

¶21

Page 2 of 3

¶22

appr.28.2019_23.doc

¶23

iii) The applicant/accused shall make himself available on

¶24

all the Court dates.

¶25

List the Criminal Revision Application on 15.4.2019.

¶26

Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶27

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

¶28

Page 3 of 3

Dilipkumar Subhash Jaiswal v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilipkumar Subhash Jaiswal v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jalal Kasim Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sambhaji Rangrao Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sankalp Enterprises Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shukraraj P. Ghadge Vs the State of Maharashtra

Archita Pranav Thaker Vs Pranav Ashok Thaker and Ors.

Manoj Taurani Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.