This court dismissed the Criminal Writ Petition as the charge was framed in 2016, rendering the petition infructuous. The order contains no substantive legal proposition.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907.WP659_2016.doc
Vidya Amin.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 659 OF 2016
Sambhaji Rangrao Patil … Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. S.V. Marwadi i/b. Mr. S.R. Mithare, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.R. Patil, APP for the respondent/State.
CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED: 18th January, 2019.
P.C. :
The learned APP submitted that charge is framed in this matter in the year 2016. Learned APP is directed to produce the copy of the charge sheet. On this point, learned counsel for the petitioner also seeks time to take instructions.
with the instructing counsel, confirms that the charge is already framed in the year 2016.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
1 of 1
Sambhaji Rangrao Patil
The State of Maharashtra
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
