The High Court at Bombay disposed of Criminal Appeals Nos. 267 of 2017 and 123 of 2018 as they no longer survive due to the prior disposal of the underlying Criminal Revision Applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902 & 903.Appln267 & 123_2018.doc
Vidya Amin.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 267 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 434 OF 2015
Sham Constructions
… Applicant
vs.
Sankalp Enterprises & Anr. … Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2018 IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 435 OF 2015
Sankalp Enterprises
… Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr Anilkumar K. Patil, Advocate for the applicant/accused. Mr. Noman Jafri i/b. MIR Associates, Advocate for respondent No. 2/original complainant..
Mr. A.R. Patil, APP for the respondent/State.
CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED: 18th January, 2019.
P.C. :
In view of disposal of Criminal Revision Application No. 434 of 2015 and Criminal Revision Application No. 435 of 2015, Criminal Application No. 267 of 2017 and Criminal Application No. 123 of 2018 do not survive and hence they are disposed of accordingly.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
1 of 1
Sham Constructions
Sankalp Enterprises
The State of Maharashtra
Sankalp Enterprises
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
