Application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to furnish the correct address of the non-applicant despite opportunities granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appa86.18.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 86/2018
Vishnu s/o Raghunath Mathankar .vs. Rahul s/o Arvind Bondare
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. S. G. Joshi, Advocate for applicant.
CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : MARCH 5, 2019
Mr. Joshi, learned counsel for applicant.
In spite of fullest opportunities granted to applicant, the applicant is not taking any steps to furnish correct address of non applicant. Hence, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE
kahale
Vishnu s/o Raghunath Mathankar
Rahul s/o Arvind Bondare
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
