Petitioner challenged the tender process. Court found the work was awarded to a third party and completion was imminent. Petitioner's writ petitioner was disposed of without elaboration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp81518.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.815 OF 2018
S. N. Products
Petitioner
Versus
The Superintending Engineer & others
Respondents
Mr.D.J.Choudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.A.B.Girase, Government Pleader for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, C.J. &
N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 14th December, 2018
PER COURT:
1 The petitioner raises challenge to the tender process issued by the Respondent No.1 for providing office furniture.
2 The learned Government Pleader submits that the respondents have already awarded the tender work to Respondent No.3 and the work is likely to be completed.
3 In this view of the matter, writ petition stands disposed of.
N.M.JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
adb/
S. N. Products
The Superintending Engineer
NARESH H. PATIL
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
