Petitioner sought admission to a course. Court recorded statement that admission was secured and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp406817.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4068 OF 2017
Sangram s/o Vyankat Hande
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.N.L.Jadhav, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar, Additional Government Pleader for Respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr.S.R.Barlinge, Advocate for Respondents No.4 & 5.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 13th December, 2018
PER COURT:
1 Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, makes a statement that the petitioner has secured admission to the subject-course for which the petitioner has prayed for.
2 In view of this statement, the writ petition stands disposed of.
N.M.JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
adb/
Sangram s/o Vyankat Hande
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
