This single-paragraph order notes that the writ petition is disposed based on earlier reasons and dismisses the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp744.18.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.744 OF 2018
Manoj Pralhad Peddawad & others
Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.A.V.Indrale Patil, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.P.S.Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, C.J. &
N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 14th December, 2018
PER COURT:
1 Learned Counsel for the petitioners places on record copy of the judgment delivered by this Court in Writ Petition No. 1273 of 2014 with Writ Petition No.5985 of 2016, decided on 19 October, 2018. Same is taken on record.
2 For the reasons recorded in the aforesaid judgment, writ petition stands dismissed.
N.M.JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
adb/
Manoj Pralhad Peddawad & others
The State of Maharashtra & others
NARESH H. PATIL
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
