Disposed
Mohammad Huzaif Mohammad Waseem v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCWP/2859/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ Petition disposed of as infructuous due to subsequent development.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp285918.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2859 OF 2018
Mohammad Huzaif s/o Mohammad Waseem
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.H.I.Pathan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.R.N.Dhasalkar, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents No.1.
Mr.S.S.Jadhavar, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 14th December, 2018
PER COURT:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent development, petition has become infructuous.
Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
N.M.JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
adb/
Mohammad Huzaif
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court