Disposed

Digambar Hari Mane and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC23 Aug 2018WP/7753/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order directs the Education Officer to consider payment of arrears of salary to petitioner teachers from their initial appointment dates until regularization, following a previous precedent, within four months and disposes of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Education Officer to consider the proposal for payment of arrears of salary to petitioners from initial date of appointment till regularization within four months.

Digambar Hari Mane and Others Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

1 wp 7753.15

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 7753 OF 2015

¶4

Digambar Hari Mane and others .. Petitioners

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents

¶7

Shri Prakashsing B. Patil, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6. Shri J. R. Shah, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 7 and 8.

¶8

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATE : 23RD AUGUST, 2018.

¶9

FINAL ORDER :

¶10

. Mr. Patil, the learned advocate for petitioners submits that, services of the petitioners on 30^th April, 2007 were regularized with effect from initial date of appointments. The petitioner No. 1 was appointed on 01.07.1998 and petitioner Nos. 2 to 5 were appointed on 15.11.1997 as assistant teachers on adhoc basis. The learned counsel submits that, Writ Petition No. 1901 of 1999 was filed by petitioners along with one Smt. Asha Madhukar Pingale. According to the learned counsel, as their claims were under consideration with the State Government, petitioners filed pursis for withdrawal of the writ petition. In the pursis it was clearly mentioned that the claims of petitioners are

¶11

2 wp 7753.15

¶12

under consideration with the Government. However, Smt. Asha Pingale continued with the writ petition. This Court under order dated 09.12.2013 allowed the writ petition and directed the Education Officer (Secondary) to take appropriate decision in the matter and if Education Officer proceeds to hold that the petitioner No. 2 i. e. Smt. Asha Pingale is eligible to receive salary amount, it shall be released and paid to the petitioner within a period of four months. Pursuant thereto proposal was submitted and it is stated that, the Education Officer has granted said proposal and given pay scale and arrears to Smt. Ashal Madhukar Pingale for the period since the date of appointment till the date of regularization. The proposal of the petitioners is also forwarded on 09^th March 2012 for payment of the arrears. Same is not considered by the Education Officer.

¶13

The Education Officer shall consider the proposal for payment of arrears to petitioners from the initial date of appointment till the date of regularization within a period of four (04) months from today on similar lines that of Smt. Asha Madhukar Pingale. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

¶14

[S. M. GAVHANE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]

¶15

bsb/Aug. 18

Digambar Hari Mane and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Digambar Hari Mane and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tulsheeram Chandrasen Ukirde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Nagnath Nivruttirao Kidile Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Walchand Dhondu Sonwane and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

State of Maha and Ors. Vs Arvind Sumant Engineer and Ors.

State of Maha and Ors. Vs Nilkanth Vyankatrao Kumbhar and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs Chudaman Daga Pawar