This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
wp1392.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1392 OF 2016 NAGNATH NIVRUTTIRAO KIDILE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr.S.G.Rudrawar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, AGP for respondent/State.
Mr.V.S.Kodale h/f. V.D.Gunale, Advocate for R-2.
Mr.P.R.Tandale, Advocate for R-4.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA &
S.M.GAVHANE, JJ.
DATED :21.08.2018
P.C. :-
1.It is submitted that the petitioner is not
allowed to work after 2009. In that case it would be
case of otherwise termination. The petition is filed in
the year 2016.
2.If it is case of otherwise termination, the
remedy is before the School Tribunal. The petitioner may
take up proceedings as may be permissible in law. All the
contentions of the parties are kept open. The writ
petition is disposed of. No costs.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.]
[S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.]
snk/2018/AUG18/ wp1392.16
NAGNATH NIVRUTTIRAO KIDILE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
S.M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court