Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw a writ petition filed under Art. 226 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court granted the liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw the writ petition was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp5805.16
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5805 OF 2016 SHAIKH RASHID SHAIKH ABDUL RAHEMAN VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : S.S. SHINDE &
Registrar's ordersS.M. GAVHANE, JJ.
DATED : 16.01.2018
Mr.D.B.Gaikwad, Advocate for petitioner
Mr.S.B.Yawalkar, AGP for resp./State.
Mr.S.M.Ganachari, Advocate for R-2&3.
Mr.S.S.Jawale, Advocate for R-4 & 6.
1.Learned Counsel appearing for
the petitioner, on instructions, seeks
liberty to withdraw this petition with
further liberty to avail of an
appropriate remedy, as available in
law.
2.The writ petition is dismissed
as withdrawn with liberty as prayed
for.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.]
[S.S.SHINDE,J.]
snk/2018/JAN18/ wp5805.16
Shaikh Rashid Shaikh Abdul Rahman
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shine
S.M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court