Single sentence order disposing the petition as the grievance regarding a meeting notice was found redressed, citing instructions that notices were already issued to Panchayat members.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp286.18
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 286 OF 2018 SHANKUNTALABAI SUBHASH TANDHALE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Office Notes,Office Memorandaof Coram,appearances, Court'sorders or directions and |
CoCORAM |
urt's or Judge's orders:S.S. SHINDE & |
|---|---|---|
Registrar's orders |
S.M. GAVHANE, JJ. |
|
DATED |
:16.01.2018 |
|
Mr.K.D.Khad |
e, Advocate for petitioner. |
|
Mr.P.K.Lakh |
otiya, AGP for resp./State. |
|
Mr.N.P.Bang |
ar, Advocate for R7. |
1.Learned Counsel Mr. N.P. Bangar
appears for respondent No.7. On
instructions, he submits that already
notices are issued to the Members of the
Panchayat to participate in the meeting,
which is scheduled to be held on
18.01.2018. This submission made by the
Counsel appearing for respondent No.7 is
not disputed by the Counsel appearing for
the petitioner. In that view of the
matter, the main grievance raised in this
petition stands redressed. The writ
petition is disposed of accordingly.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.]
[S.S.SHINDE,J.]
snk/2018/JAN18/ wp286.18
SHANKUNTALABAI SUBHASH TANDHALE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
S.S. SHINDE
S.M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court