The Single Judge disposed of the Contempt Petition as premature. The court relied on its earlier order in the underlying Writ Petition which directed the respondent Corporation to take a decision on a proposal within six months. Since the petition was filed before that period expired, it was dismissed.
The Contempt Petition stands disposed of as premature.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
704.17CP
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
______________________________________________________ CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 704 OF 2017 IN WP/10932/2016
KRUSHNA PARBHAT THOKAL
VERSUS D M MUGLIKAR
...
Advocate for the petitioner:Mr.S.V. Deshmukh
Advocate for respondent : Mr. S.S. Tope
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & S.M. GAVHANE, JJ. Dated: January 15, 2018
Heard.
2.Filing of this Contempt Petition even
before expiry of six months from passing
of the order by this Court on 9th August,
2017 is premature. This Court while
disposing of the Writ Petition No. 10932
of 2016 (Krishna S/o Parbhat Thokal V/s
The State of Maharashtra and others) in
para 3 observed thus :-
“3.In view of the aforesaid, we
dispose of the petition, by directing
704.17CP
2
the respondent – Corporation to
considerandtakeappropriate
decision in regard to the aforesaid
proposal in the next General Body
meeting and communicate the said to
the petitioner. We expect that the
decision as aforesaid shall be taken
by General Body within a period of
six months from the date of receipt
of proposal.”
3.In that view of the matter, Contempt
Petition stands disposed of.
(S.M. GAVHANE,J) (S.S. SHINDE,J)
SGA/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition, filed before the expiry of six months from the impugned order, is premature and requires disposition.
Krushna Parbhat Thokal
D M Muglikar
S.S. Shinde
S.M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court