Disposed

Sanjay Shahurao Sanap and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC16 Jan 2018WP/181/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking direction to conduct an election for the post of Upsarpanch. It directed respondents to hold the meeting as per the notice issued on 29.01.2018 without any deferment.

What did the court decide?

Directions to respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to conduct a meeting for election of Upsarpanch on 29.01.2018 as per notice without deferment.

Sanjay Shahurao Sanap and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and… — Election Law | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

( 1 ) wp181.18

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 181 OF 2018

¶4

Sanjay Shahurao Sanap & Ors.

¶5

..Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

¶8

..Respondents

¶9

Mr.M.S. Karad, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1
to 3.

¶10

Mr.S.A. Nagarsoje, Advocate for respondent No.4.
Mr.M.S. Bhosale, Advocate for respondent No.5.

¶11

CORAM : S.S.SHINDE &
S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.
DATED :16.01.2018

¶12

P.C. :-

¶13

1.Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners,
learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent/State
and learned Counsels appearing for respondent Nos.4 and
5. Learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.4 has
tendered across the bar copy of notice issued by the
Gram-sevak to the Members of the Panchayat mentioning
therein that meeting will be held on 29.01.2018 at 02.00
p.m. for election of Upsarpanch. Copy of said notice is
taken on record.

¶14

2.So far as prayer seeking direction to respondent
to fix the date so as to conduct election for the post of

¶15

Upsarpanch has been fulfilled, we are inclined to dispose
of this petition with following directions :-

¶16

3.We direct respondent Nos.2 to 5 to ensure that
as indicated in the notice, respondent Nos. 4 and 5 shall
conduct meeting on 29.01.2018 and under any circumstances
they shall not defer/postpone said meeting.

¶17

4.We make it clear that we have not entertained
any other prayer in the petition.

¶18

5.With the above observations, the petition stands
disposed of.

¶19

6.Parties to act upon authenticated copy of this
order.

¶20

[S.M.GAVHANE,J.] [S.S.SHINDE,J.]

¶21

snk/2018/SEP18/ wp181.18

Sanjay Shahurao Sanap and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Shahurao Sanap and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Chief Secretary Government of Maharashtra Mumbai and Others Vs Jagannath Shamrao Patil and Another

Shriniwas Nampeli Andhelwar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Krushna Parbhat Thokal Vs D M Muglikar

Shankuntalabai Subhash Tandhale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Gangadhar Ganpatrao Kalyankar Vs the Union of India and Another

Shaikh Rashid Shaikh Abdul Raheman Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others