The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition after the court expressed disinclination to grant relief; leave was granted and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition; disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
912-os-wp-478-15.doc
DSS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 478 OF 2015
Liladhar V. Chogle ..Petitioner versus State Govt. of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Vilas N. Mali for the Petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Takker, AGP for the Respondent – State .
CORAM: S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI HARISH DANGRE, JJ. DATE : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2018.
P. C. :
After this Court expressed disinclination to grant any relief in writ jurisdiction, leave is sought to withdraw the petition, i.e., Writ Petition No.478 of 2015 and the same is therefore, disposed of as withdrawn.
(SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Dinesh
1 of 1
Liladhar V. Chogle
State Govt. of Maharashtra
S. C. Dharmadhikari
Smt. Bharati Harish Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
