Allowed
Prakash Revachand Budhrani and Ors. v. Vishal Mathuraprasad Gupta
Bombay HCCAW/1074/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
910-caw-1074-14.doc
DSS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1074 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3993 OF 2014
| Prakash R. Budhrani and ors. In the matter between |
..Applicants |
|---|---|
| Vishal M. Gupta | .. Petitioner |
| versus | |
| Collector of Thane and ors. | ..Respondents |
Mr. Rajesh S. Datar for the Applicants Mr. A.S. Rao for the Petitioner. Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM: S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI HARISH DANGRE, JJ.
DATE : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2018
P. C. :
2] For the reasons set out in the application, the intervention application is allowed.
(SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Dinesh
1 of 1
Prakash R. Budhrani and ors.
Vishal M. Gupta
Collector of Thane and ors.
S. C. Dharmadhikari
Bharati Harish Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court