Mehrunnissa Mushtaq Sayed v. the Union of India through the Director General and Ors.
Bombay HCAPPW/59/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
in wp-5370-17.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-cri-appw-59-18 in wp-5370-17.doc
DSS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 59 OF 2018 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5370 OF 2017
Mehrunnissa M. Sayed versus The Union of India and ors.
..Petitioner
..Respondents
Mrs. A.Z. Ansari for the Petitioner. Mrs. Aruna Pai for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. MR. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent No.3-State.
CORAM: S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI HARISH DANGRE, JJ.
DATE : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2018.
P. C. :
2] For the reasons set out in the application and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, leave to amend the petition is granted. Amendment to be carried out within one week from today. The amended memo of petition be served on the respondents within one week thereafter. We post Writ Petition No. 5370 of 2017 on 15.03.2018 for "Final Hearing". In the meanwhile, all affidavits shall be exchanged.
(SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Dinesh
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to amend the writ petition should be granted to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
Mehrunnissa M. Sayed
The Union of India
S. C. Dhar madhikari
Smt. Bharati Harish Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court