The notice of motion was disposed of as it did not survive following the disposal of the related central excise appeal.
The notice of motion was disposed of as it did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
910(ii)-NMA.2765.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2765 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 279 OF 2016
The Commissioner of Service } Tax-IV } Applicant versus M/s. Rosy Blue (I) Ltd. } Respondent
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Mr. J. B. Mishra for the applicant.
Mr. B. J. Raichandani with Mr. Anshal Jain for the respondent.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ. DATE :- FEBRUARY 14, 2018
P.C. :-
In the light of the disposal of the central excise appeal, the notice of motion does not survive and stands disposed of as such.
(SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
The Commissioner of Service Tax-IV
M/s. Rosy Blue (I) Ltd.
S. C. Dharmadhikari
Smt. Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
