The single-judge bench directed the Education Officer, Ahmednagar, to decide on the petitioners' appointment proposal within four weeks.
Direction to the respondent Education Officer, Ahmednagar, to take a decision on the appointment proposal within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp445.18
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 445 OF 2018
SUVARNA SUDHAKAR RANDHAVE AND ANOTEHR VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : S.S. SHINDE &
Registrar's orders S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.
DATED : 11.01.2018
Mr.S.R.Barlinge, Advocate for the
petitioners
Mr.P.N.Kutti,AGPforthe
respondent/State
PER COURT:
.This petition can be disposed
of with the direction to the respondent
No.4 Education Officer, Ahmednagar to
take the decision on the proposal
submitted by respondent Nos. 5 and 6
for approval of the appointment of the
petitioners, if decision has already
not taken, as expeditiously as
possible, however, within four weeks
from today and communicate the said
order to the respondent Nos.5 and 6.
2 wp445.18
2.We make it clear that, we have
not expressed any opinion on merits of
the proposal and it is for the
respondent No.4 to take the decision on
its own merits.
3.With the above observations
the writ petition stands disposed of.
4.The parties to act upon
authenticated copy.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
VishalK /wp445.18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to fast-track disposal of their appointment proposal.
SUVARNA SUDHAKAR RANDHAVE AND ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
S.S. SHINDE
S.M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court