Dismissed

Ashwin Trimbak Shrikhande and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC11 Jan 2018WP/427/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court rejected the writ petition as misconceived because the petitioner approached the wrong authority, directing them to file a representation with the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to file a comprehensive representation to the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad.

Ashwin Trimbak Shrikhande and Another Vs the State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

( 1 )

¶2

wp427.18

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 427 OF 2018

¶5

ASHWIN TRIMBAK SHRIKHANDE AND ANOTHER VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶7

Mr.Estling S. Murge, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.P.N.Kutti, AGP for the respondent/State

¶8

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE &
S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.
DATED :11.01.2018

¶9

P.C. :-

¶10

.This petition is misconceived in as much as the
representation of the petitioner dated 23.08.2017 (Exh.D)
(Page Nos. 25 and 26) was addressed to the Secretary
Rural Development Department, Maharashtra State, Mumbai.
In fact the immediate authority to take the cognizance of
the grievance raised by the petitioner is Chief Executive
Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. In that view of the
matter we are not inclined to entertain this petition.
Further we grant liberty to the petitioner to file
comprehensive representation to the Chief Executive
Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The concerned
authority to decide the same on its own merits as
expeditiously as possible.

¶11

( 2 ) wp427.18 2. With the above observations the writ petition stands rejected. While considering the said representation, the order passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Revenue, Aurangabad shall also be taken into consideration.

¶12

[S.M. GAVHANE, J.][S.S. SHINDE, J.]

¶13

VishalK/ wp427.18

Ashwin Trimbak Shrikhande and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashwin Trimbak Shrikhande and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S S a Pathan through Proprietor Shahid Abubkar Pathan Vs Ahmednagar Cantonment Board Ahmednagar through Chief Executive Officer Ahmednagar

Dhule Education Society Dhule through Its Secretary Santosh Subhashchandra Agrawal and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bandy Association of Indians through Its Secretary Lovekumar Kaduba Jadhav Vs the General Secretary Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs Government of India New Delhi and Anothe

Suvarna Sudhakar Randhave and Anotehr Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sanjay Vishram Sonowane Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Tabrez Mohd. Hanif Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others