Disposed

Dhule Education Society Dhule through Its Secretary Santosh Subhashchandra Agrawal and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC10 Jan 2018WP/390/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction to the Education Officer to decide proposals for appointment approval within 12 weeks. The single-judge bench granted this direction and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Education Officer (Secondary) to decide the proposals for approval to the appointments of the petitioners within 12 weeks.

Dhule Education Society Dhule through Its Secretary… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

wp390.18

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.390 OF 2018

¶6

1) Dhule Education Society, Dhule,
2) Natyabhau Daga Halor,
3) Prawshant Bhimrao Palwe,
4) Pankaj Madhukar Bhabad
...PETITIONERS
 VERSUS
1) The State of Maharashtra,
 Through its Secretary,
 School and Education Department,
 Mantralaya, Mumbai-32,
2) The Director of Education,
 Maharashtra State, Pune,
3) The Education Officer(Secondary),
 Dhule.
...RESPONDENTS
 ...
 Mr.A.B. Jagtap Advocate h/f. Mr. V.D. Sapkal
 Advocate for Petitioners.
 Mr.C.S. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for Respondents.
 ...
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
 S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.
 DATE : 10TH JANUARY, 2018

¶7

wp390.18

¶8

¶9

ORDER :

¶10

1. By this Petition under Article-226 of the
Constitution of India, the Petitioner has prayed
to direct the Education officer to decide the
proposals for approval to the appointments of
Petitioner Nos.2 to 4 submitted by Petitioner No.1
Institution on 27th March, 2014, 30th August, 2012
and 10th December, 2014.

¶11

2.Since there is innocuous prayer, in as

¶12

much as only directions are sought to decide the
proposals within stipulated period, we issue
following directions.

¶13

3.We direct Respondent No.3 - The Education
Officer (Secondary) Dhule, to decide the proposals
for approval to the appointments of Petitioner
Nos. 2 to 4 submitted by Petitioner No.1 on 27th
March, 2014, 30th August, 2012 and 10th December,
2014, if already not decided, on its own merits as

¶14

wp390.18

¶15

expeditiously as possible however within 12 weeks
from today.

¶16

4.Needless to observe that in case

¶17

Respondent No.3 is of the opinion that before
decision is taken it is necessary to call the
Petitioners for hearing, the Petitioners shall

¶18

extend full co-operation to Respondent No.3.

¶19

directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶20

.Parties to act upon authenticated copy of
this order.

¶21

asb/JAN18

Dhule Education Society Dhule through Its Secretary Santosh Subhashchandra Agrawal and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhule Education Society Dhule through Its Secretary Santosh Subhashchandra Agrawal and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Tanvi Constructions through Its Proprietor Sharad Digambarrao Tope Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Nitin Ramrao Nagargoje Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Peoples Education Society Mandane through Its Chairman J T Pawar and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

M/S S a Pathan through Proprietor Shahid Abubkar Pathan Vs Ahmednagar Cantonment Board Ahmednagar through Chief Executive Officer Ahmednagar

Bandy Association of Indians through Its Secretary Lovekumar Kaduba Jadhav Vs the General Secretary Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs Government of India New Delhi and Anothe

Maulana Abdul Rahim Abdul Razzak Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another