Single judge bench disposed of the writ petition, stating the court is not inclined to entertain it but suggesting the petitioner approach the learned Collector for an expeditious hearing of the election dispute.
Petitioner directed to apply to the learned Collector, Jalgaon, for an expeditious hearing of the election dispute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp444.18
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 444 OF 2018
SANJAY VISHRAM SONOWANE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : S.S. SHINDE &
Registrar's orders S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.
DATED : 11.01.2018
Mr.Paresh B. Patil, Advocate for the
petitioner
Mr.S.S.Dande,AGPforthe
respondent/State
Mr.M.S.Sonawane,Advocatefor
respondent No.2
PER COURT:
.We are not inclined to
entertain this petition. However, it
would be open for the petitioner to
apply before the learned Collector,
Jalgaon, if already not applied for
expeditious hearing of the election
dispute. The learned Collector,
Jalgaon to consider such request
keeping in view the term of the
Grampanchayat.
2
wp444.18
2.With the above observations
the writ petition stands disposed of.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
VishalK /wp444.18
SANJAY VISHRAM SONOWANE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
OTHERS
S.S. SHINDE
S.M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court