Disposed
Venkat Santram Mundhe v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCWP/2927/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
16 WRIT PETITION NO. 2927 OF 2017
VENKAT SANTRAM MUNDHE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Wakade Ramesh I. AGP for Respondent no.1 : Mr. A.V.Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent nos.2 and 3 : Mr. S.K.Chavan Advocate for Respondents 5 : Mrs. S.M.Kshirsagar h/f Mr. P.N.Kalani
CORAM: S.V.GANGAPURWALA
AND
SUNIL K.KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 8, 2018
O R D E R :
Mr. Chavan, learned counsel appears for
respondent nos. 2 and 3 and submits that the inquiry
committee was constituted to inquire about the work of
respondent nos. 4 and 5. One member of the inquiry
committee was suspended for another charge and as such,
inquiry could not be concluded.
2.Learned counsel, on instructions, submits that
within a period of two months fresh inquiry committee
would be constituted and new inquiry committed would
2 wp2927.17
conclude the inquiry within three months from the
date of its constitution. Statement is accepted.
3.In view of said statement, Writ Petition is
disposed of. No costs.
[SUNIL K.KOTWAL, J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.]
dbm
Venkat Santram Mundhe
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court