Disposed

Shashikant Ramrao Patil and Others v. the Secretary Tribal Social Welfare Department Mumbai and Another

Bombay HC7 Aug 2018WP/1533/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court directed the State Government to consider the petitioners' request for absorption into regular schools within six months if they proved continuous service of ten years under the Grants-in-Aid scheme, and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the grievance for absorption within six months from the date of representation.

Shashikant Ramrao Patil and Others Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

1 wp 1533.18

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 1533 OF 2018

¶4

Shashikant Ramrao Patil and others..Petitioners
Versus
The Secretary,
Tribal / Social Welfare Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai and others.. RespondentsRespondents

¶5

.. RespondentsRespondents

¶6

Shri Rahul S. Pawar, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Shri P. K. Lakhotiya, A.G.P. for Respondents.

¶7

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE: 7 th August, 2018

¶8

PER COURT :

¶9

1.The learned for the petitioners submits that

¶10

the petitioners would make representation to
respondent nos. 1 and 2 for absorption. The
learned counsel submits that the petitioners were
working under the scheme “Grants-in-Aid to
Voluntary Organisations working for welfare of
Scheduled Tribes”. The petitioners schools where
the petitioners were working received the grants
for ten years continuously. The staff working in

¶11

the schools run under the said scheme are already

¶12

2 wp 1533.18

¶13

absorbed with the other schools, however, the
petitioners are not absorbed. The petitioners
belong to the teaching and non-teaching staff.
The State Government has absorbed the staff of the
Wasti Shala into the regular schools but the same
relief is not being given to the petitioners.

¶14

2.In case the petitioners were working

¶15

continuously for a period of ten years on grant-
in-aid basis, then the respondents shall consider

¶16

the grievance raised by the petitioners for
absorption on appropriate terms, on its own
merits, in accordance with law, expeditiously and
preferably within a period of six (6) months from
the date the petitioners would make the
representation.

¶17

3.Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of.
No costs.

¶18

[SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]

¶19

marathe

Shashikant Ramrao Patil and Others v. the Secretary Tribal Social Welfare Department Mumbai and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shashikant Ramrao Patil and Others v. the Secretary Tribal Social Welfare Department Mumbai and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Narayan Lobhe and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Ashok Bajirao Girwale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Jyoti Kishor Pardeshi Vs Nandkumar and Others

Santosh Kishanrao Chavan and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Anjali Prataprao Ghare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Kalidas Shivajirao Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others