Allowed

Ramesh Maroti Adhagale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC8 Aug 2018WP/9198/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court declared that A.C.P.S. benefits applicable to non-teaching Group C and D staff in aided private schools extend to similar staff in private aided Ashram Schools. The court directed the State to examine individual cases within six months and extend benefits to eligible petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Declared A.C.P.S. benefits applicable to Ashram Schools; directed State to examine cases within six months and extend benefits to eligible petitioners.

Ramesh Maroti Adhagale and Others Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶2

953 WRIT PETITION NO. 9198 OF 2018

¶3

RAMESH MAROTI ADHAGALE AND OTHERS
VERSUS

¶4

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶5

...

¶6

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Dhakne Vijay A.
AGP for Respondents : Mr. A.V.Deshmukh

¶7

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA

¶8

AND

¶9

SUNIL K.KOTWAL, JJ.

¶10

 DATE : AUGUST 8, 2018

¶11

O R D E R:

¶12

. The petitioners are the members of the non teaching staff in Group D category. They claim the benefit of A.C.P.S.

¶13

Mr. Dhakne, the learned counsel for petitioners and Mr. Karlekar, the learned A. G. P. submit that, the parties would be governed by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 2358 of 2013 with other connected writ petitions decided vide judgment dated September 21, 2013.

¶14

2 wp9198.18

¶15

In the light of that, we also adopt the same recourse

¶16

and pass the following order.

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

A. We declare that the benefit of ACPS, which is applicable to the employees of Group "C" and "D" nonteaching staff of the aided Private Schools in the State under the Government Resolution dated 30th April, 1998 as modified from time to time shall be available to the nonteaching staff of the same category in the private aided Ashram Schools.

¶19

B. The appropriate Authority appointed by the Stateshall examine the individual cases of the petitioners for deciding whether they satisfy the criteria laid down for of the benefit of ACPS to the private aided Government Schools under the Government Resolution dated 30th April, 1998 as modified from time to time.

¶20

C. We make it clear that the petitioners will be entitled to the benefit of the said scheme provided they satisfy the eligibility criteria which is prescribed for the corresponding nonteaching staff of the private aided Schools.

¶21

D. We grant time of six months to the respondents to

¶22

3 wp9198.18

¶23

scrutinize the cases of the petitioners and to consider whether they are eligible for the benefit of ACPS.

¶24

E. Those petitioners who are found eligible, the benefit shall be extended, as expeditiously as possible.

¶25

F. The writ petition accordingly disposed of. No costs.

¶26

 [SUNIL K.KOTWAL, J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.]

¶27

dbm

Ramesh Maroti Adhagale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Maroti Adhagale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sharad Vitthal Bhange Vs Zilla Parishad Aurangabad through Its Chief Executive Officer and Another

Shashikant Ramrao Patil and Others Vs the Secretary Tribal Social Welfare Department Mumbai and Another

Chandrakant Eknath Bansode and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Gajanan Nagorao Rajure Vs the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded and Others

Jayashree Jagannath Kulkarni Vs Aurangabad Municipal Corporation through Its Municipal Commissioner and Others

Yashwant Shantaram More and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others