In a review application concerning an ad-interim order adjourning a writ petition, the court allowed the application but dismissed the review, directing that contentions be raised in the pending writ petition.
Review application dismissed; petitioner directed to raise contentions in the pending writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Madkar 1 C.A. No. 3530/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
972. REVIEW APPLICATION (Stamp) No. 5111 of 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1379 of 2014
Sahebrao Gajmal Patil… Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others… Respondents.
Mr. M.M. Joshi, Advocate for applicant
Mrs. V.N. Patil-Jadhav, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for respondents No.1 to 4
Coram : N.M. Jamdar, J. Date : 7 December 2018.
ORAL ORDER :
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2.By this application, the applicant has sought review of the
order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 20 September 2017.
By this order, the learned Single Judge has merely adjourned hearing
of this petition making certain observations and awaiting the decision
of the competent authority pursuant to the directions issued by the
Division Bench.
Madkar 2 C.A. No. 3530/2018
3.The learned Counsel for the applicant sought to advance
contentions as to correctness of the observations made in this order.
However, it is informed that the writ petition No. 1379 of 2014 is
still pending at the stage of admission. In these circumstances, order
dated 20 September 2017 is only an ad-interim order. Whatever
contentions petitioner wants to raise in this application, can be
advanced by the petitioner in the pending writ petition. The review
petition is accordingly disposed of.
N.M. Jamdar, J.
Sahebrao Gajmal Patil
The State of Maharashtra
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court