The Judge allowed a review application filed 138 days late, finding that sufficient cause was made out for the delay in filing.
The civil application (review application) was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Madkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
972. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3530 OF 2018
IN
REVIEW APPLICATION (Stamp) No. 5111 of 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1379 of 2014
Sahebrao Gajmal Patil… Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others… Respondents.
Mr. M.M. Joshi, Advocate for applicant
Mrs. V.N. Patil-Jadhav, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for respondents No.1 to 4
Coram : N.M. Jamdar, J.
Date : 7 December 2018.
ORAL ORDER :
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
2.Delay occurred in filing the review application is of 138
days. The cause made out having been found sufficient, the civil
application is allowed.
N.M. Jamdar, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out for allowing a review application filed after a delay of 138 days.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sahebrao Gajmal Patil
The State of Maharashtra
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court