The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad disposed of three connected writ petitions as withdrawn. Counsel for the petitioners stated that the orders were interlocutory and the main proceedings were disposed of, with parties resolving their disputes.
Writ petitions disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
dyb
1 WP5278-18dt 06-12-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5278 OF 2016
Sandeep Pandurang Garudkar…Petitioner
Versus
…
Mrs. Archana Sandeep GarudkarRespondent
Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. A.P. Avhad, Advocate for the Respondent.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4013 OF 2016
Shri Pratap Vinodkumar Muot…Petitioner
Versus
…
sau. Arohi Pratap MunotRespondent
Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for the Petitioner.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 3994 OF 2016
Manjit Kaur Harvindersingh Bindra…Petitioner
Versus
Mrs. Khirabai w/o Govind Pawar & another…Respondents
dyb
2 WP5278-18dt 06-12-2018
Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Coram : N.M. Jamdar, J. Date : 6 December 2018
Per Court :
1.Not on board. Taken on board at the request of learned
counsel for the petitioners.
2.Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the orders
impugned in these petitions are interlocutory and the main
proceedings have been disposed of as well as the parties have resolved
their dispute. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to
withdraw the petitions as infructuous.
3.Writ petitions are accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
N.M. Jamdar, J.
Sandeep Pandurang Garudkar
Mrs. Archana Sandeep Garudkar
Shri Pratap Vinodkumar Muot
sau. Arohi Pratap Munot
Manjit Kaur Harvindersingh Bindra
Mrs. Khirabai w/o Govind Pawar & another
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court