Petitioner withdrew the writ petition. The High Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn and also disposed of the pending civil application as it did not survive the withdrawal.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn. Pending civil application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp4150.04
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4150 OF 2004
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7739 OF 2008
LAXMAN S/O KHANDERAO JOGDAND
VERSUS
MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,
AURANGABAD
Advocate for the petitioner: Mr. R.L. Chintalwar
Advocate for the respondent: Mrs. Ranjana Reddy
CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 6 DECEMBER 2018
PER COURT:-
1.Te learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has
received written instructions to withdraw this writ petition. He
states that his client is present in the Court.
2. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged.
3. Since the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn, pending civil application does not survive and the same is also disposed of.
rlj/
LAXMAN S/O KHANDERAO JOGDAND
MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, AURANGABAD
N. M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court