Respondents filed a communication stating the subject factory was closed. The court noted this fact and held that nothing survives in the PIL.
The PIL is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 PIL 132-17.odt-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.132 OF 2017
Mr. Sajjad Moinuddin Sheikh. ] … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra, ] Through Principal Secretary & Ors. ] … Respondents
Ms. Sadhana Kumar for Petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Babar, AGP for Respondent No.1. Ms. Jaya Bagve i/b Sharmila Deshmukh for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. Mr. N. R. Bubna for Respondent No.4. Mr. Vaibhav Ugle for Respondent No.5.
| CORAM :-SHANTANU KEMKAR & |
|---|
| SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. |
| DATE :-AUGUST 23, 2018 |
P. C. :-
Learned Counsel for Respondent No.5, on instructions, has made a categorical statement that the subject factory has been closed. This fact has also been stated by the learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3. A communication dated 03/07/2018 to that effect has been placed on record by the learned Counsel for the Respondent No.5. The same is taken on record and marked 'X' for
identification .
URS 1 of 2
2 PIL 132-17.odt-14
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
URS 2 of 2
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
SHANTANU KEMKAR
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
