Disposed
Bajaj Finserv Limited v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCCAW/359/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 4567-09 @ Others-STM.odt-904
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4567 OF 2009 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.359 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4567 OF 2009
ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4530 OF 2009 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.360 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4530 OF 2009
ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4565 OF 2009 ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4569 OF 2009 ALONG WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.440 OF 2017 ALONG WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.441 OF 2017
Bajaj Finserv Limited. ] … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ] … Respondents
Mr. P. B. Kulkarni for Petitioner Mrs. Reena Salunke, Addl. G. P. for Respondent No.1. Mr. Siddhesh Pilankar i/b Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for Respondent Nos.2 & 3.
URS 1 of 2
2 WP 4567-09 @ Others-STM.odt-904
CORAM :- SHANTANU KEMKAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE :- AUGUST 24, 2018
P. C. :-
In paragraph 2 of the the order dated 21st August, 2018,
after the word 'retrospectively', the following be added :
“from the year 2011”.
The order stands corrected accordingly.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
Bajaj Finserv Limited.
The State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court