Petitioner in PIL No. 160 of 2016 stated that grievances no longer arose due to steps taken by respondents. Court dismissed the petition allowing no-further-submission prayer.
Petition disposed of allowing petitioner's statement that grievance no longer survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 160 OF 2016
Shri Balkrishna Ramchandra Kakade .. Petitioner Vs.
The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department and ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Vivek V. Salunke, for the Petitioner. Mrs.Kavita N. Solunke, AGP for State.
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 24th AUGUST 2018
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that in view
of the steps taken by respondents, grievance of the petitioner no
more survives. The Public Interest Litigation is disposed of as
such.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (B.R.GAVAI, J.)
1/1
Shri Balkrishna Ramchandra Kakade
The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department and ors.
B.R. Gavai
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
