The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the Civil Application in terms of specific prayer clauses, granting a one-month extension to the applicant to remove office objections to the registration of a PIL.
Civil Application allowed to remove office objections to PIL registration within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cai29.doc
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.29 OF 2018 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION ST.NO.33955 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s ordersCourt’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Rajendra M. Haridas for the Applicant
Ms Nisha Mehra, AGP for the Respondent-State
Digitally signed by Shubhashri Shubhashri Shridhar Shridhar Pathak Pathak Date: 2018.08.03 15:18:05 +0530
CORAM :A.S.OKA AND
RIYAZ.I.CHAGLA,JJ.
DATE :AUGUST 2, 2018
P.C.:
.Not on board. Taken on board.
1 Registration of the PIL filed by
the applicant has been refused for non
removal of the office objections.
2The Civil Application is allowed in
terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b)
subject to condition that all office
objections in the PIL shall be removed
by the applicant within a period of one
month from today.
3If office objections are not
removed within stipulated period, the
2
cai29.doc order of refusal of registration of the PIL shall stand.
(RIYAZ.I.CHAGLA,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the Civil Application regarding the office objections to the registration of the PIL.
Mr. Rajendra M. Haridas
Ms Nisha Mehra
A.S.Oka
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court