Disposed

World All Sports Games through Its Secretary Lovekumar Kaduba Jadhav v. the General Secretary Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs Government of India New Delhi and Anothe

Bombay HC24 Jan 2018WP/1005/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition seeking directions to decide pending representations, the High Court at Aurangabad directed the respondents to decide the submissions within three months and communicated the decision without commenting on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to decide pending representations within three months and communicate decision.

World All Sports Games through Its Secretary Lovekumar… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

wp1005.18

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

 WRIT PETITION NO.1005 OF 2018

¶6

World All Sports Games,
Through its Secretary,
Lovekumar s/o Kaduba Jadhav,
Age-33 years, Occu:Business,
R/o-C/o-Plot No.223, Growth Centre-II,
Cidco Waluj Mahanagar-2,
Aurangabad.

¶7

...PETITIONER

¶8

 VERSUS

¶9

1) The General Secretary,
 Ministry of Sports & Youth Affairs,
 Government of India,

¶10

 Room NO.1, C-Wing, Shastri Bhawan,
 New Delhi-110001,

¶11

2) The General Secretary,

¶12

 Indian Olympic Association,
 IOA, Bhawan B-29, Qutub Institutional
 Area, New Delhi-110016.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

...

¶15

 Mr.Ashok R. Tapse Advocate for Petitioner.
 Mr.D.G. Nagode Advocate for Respondent No.1.

¶16

...

¶17

CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND

¶18

 DATE : 24TH JANUARY, 2018

¶19

wp1005.18

¶20

¶21

ORDER :

¶22

1. Heard. There is innocuous prayer in the

¶23

Petition, in as much as the representations filed
by the Petitioner with Respondent Nos.1 and 2
have not yet been decided.

¶24

2.In that view of the matter, we direct the
Respondents to decide the pending representations
submitted by the Petitioner, dated 13th September,
2016, 16th September, 2016, 7th February, 2017 and

¶25

15th May, 2017, if already not decided, in
accordance with law/rules, procedure, as
expeditiously as possible, however within THREE
MONTHS from today and communicate the said
decision to the Petitioner.

¶26

3.We make it clear that we have not

¶27

commented upon the merits of the contentions
raised in the Petition.

¶28

wp1005.18

¶29

¶30

4. With these observations and directions,

¶31

the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶32

. Parties to act upon authenticated copy of

¶33

this order.

¶34

[S.M. GAVHANE, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]

¶35

asb/JAN18

World All Sports Games through Its Secretary Lovekumar Kaduba Jadhav v. the General Secretary Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs Government of India New Delhi and Anothe

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

World All Sports Games through Its Secretary Lovekumar Kaduba Jadhav v. the General Secretary Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs Government of India New Delhi and Anothe

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devendra Tukaram Katke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sanjay Madhukar Kale and Others Vs Anuja Kalyan Gore and Others

Shri Swami Vivekanand Shikshan Sanstha Kolhapur through the Secretary and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dudhate Mandap Decoration through Its Proprietor S M Dudhate Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shivraj Kankayya Nagalu Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Avinash Balaji Ghodke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others