This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
437.2018WP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.437 OF 2018
DUDHATE MANDAP DECORATION, PARBHANI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
...
Mr.G.R.Syed, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.S.S.Dande, AGP for the respondent/State
Mr.S.V.Dixit, Advocate for respondent no.2.
...
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
S.M.GAVHANE, JJ.
DATE : 24.01.2018
ORDER:
1] Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that respondents have decided to call separate tenders under different heads like erection of the temporary stalls, supply of electricity, collecting of rent, etc. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has tendered across the Bar withdrawal pursis , and the same is taken on record.
2] In view of withdrawal pursis , the Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
3]We make it clear that we have not entered
upon the contentions raised on merits either by
the petitioner or by the respondents.
437.2018WP
2
4]Needless to observe that the learned
counsel appearing for the respective parties will
be at liberty to communicate this order to their
respective clients.
[S.M.GAVHANE] [S.S.SHINDE]
JUDGE JUDGE
DDC
DUDHATE MANDAP DECORATION, PARBHANI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
S.M.GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court