The court recorded service of notices and affidavits. It found sufficient cause for condoning a 76-day delay and made the notice of motion absolute, listing the appeal for admission.
Notice of Motion made absolute; appeal listed for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
nma19.doc
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.19 OF 2018 IN
APPEAL (L)NO.389 OF 2017
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s ordersCourt’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Abhishek Bhadang i/b Mr.Nikhil Randive for the
Applicant
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
M.S.SONAK,JJ
DATE : OCTOBER 22, 2018
P.C.
1 The learned counsel appearing for
the applicant states that the notices
have been served to the respondents and
affidavit of service has been filed.
2There is no reply filed. Sufficient
cause is made out for condonation of
delay of 76 days in the light of
averments made in the affidavit in
support. Accordingly, the Notice of
Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
2 nma19.doc
3After the appeal is numbered, the
same shall be listed for Admission on
the date fixed as per the C.M.I.S.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay of 76 days in filing reply to notice of motion.
Applicant
Respondents
A.S.OKA
M.S.SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court