The Court condoned a delay of nine days and allowed the Notice of Motion in the Appeal (L) No.355 of 2017, which was opposite to the respondent's opposition.
The Notice of Motion is made absolute, allowing condonation of delay of 9 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
nma1721.doc
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1721 OF 2017 IN
APPEAL (L) NO.355 OF 2017
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s ordersCourt’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Agnel Carneiro i/b M/s.Mulla & Mulla & Craigie
Blunt & Caroe for the Applicant Appellant
Ms Disha Shetty i/b Ms Irani for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
M.S.SONAK,JJ
DATE : OCTOBER 22, 2018
P.C.
1 Heard the learned counsel for the
parties. The learned counsel for the
respondent opposes the prayer for
condonation of delay on the basis of
the reply already filed on record.
Sufficient cause is made out for
condonation of delay of 9 days.
Accordingly, Notice of Motion is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(M.S.SONAK,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause exists to condone the delay by nine days in filing the appeal.
Mr.Agnel Carneiro i/b M/s.Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe
Ms Disha Shetty i/b Ms Irani
A.S.OKA
M.S.SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court