The single bench allowed an extension of time to comply with a previous order in the main writ petition. The High Court set a new deadline, noting little justification was provided by the applicants.
Extension of time granted till 28th February, 2019 to comply with the judgment and order in the Writ Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Shridhar Sutar 1 10-caw-2209.18+.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2209 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2208 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3827 OF 1999
The Union of India and another … Applicants In the matter between A. B. Pillay and others … Petitioners Versus
The Union of India and another … Respondents
Mrs. Anjali Helekar a/w Mr. N. R. Prajapati for the Applicants. Mr. Prashant Kamble i/b Mr. A. S. Rao for the Respondents.
CORAM : A. S. OKA AND M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 19th OCTOBER, 2018.
P. C.:
filed on 7th September, 2018.
1 of 2
Shridhar Sutar 2 10-caw-2209.18+.doc
Shridhar Digitally signed byShridhar Marutirao Marutirao Sutar Date: 2018.10.22 Sutar 16:02:10 +0530
2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an extension of time should be granted to comply with the previous order.
Whether further extension beyond the granted period is permissible.
Union of India and another
A. B. Pillay and others
A. S. Oka
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
