The High Court dismissed the central excise appeal as withdrawn by the appellant following a CBIC circular directing withdrawal of appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs. 50 lakhs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-CEXA-76-2017.DOC
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 76 OF 2017
Commissioner of Service Tax – I, Mumbai … Appellant Versus Mittal Towers PCS Ltd. …Respondent
Ms. P.S. Cardozo with Ms. Ruju Thakkar for the Appellant. Mr. Jas Sanghavi, I/b P.C. Tripathi, for the Respondent.
CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATED: 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2018
PC:-
the Appeal on instructions from Shyam Raj Prasad,
1/2
2-CEXA-76-2017.DOC
Commissioner, CGST & C.Ex., Mumbai South Commissionerate seeks to withdraw this Appeal. In support of this she tenders a pursis 31st August, 2018 filed by the Commissioner seeking to withdraw the Appeal in view of the CBIC circular dated 11th July, 2018. The pursis is taken on record and marked 'A' for identification.
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
2/2
Commissioner of Service Tax – I, Mumbai
Mittal Towers PCS Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court