The High Court of Bombay allowed a Notice of Motion for condonation of delay in filing a Central Excise appeal, finding the reasons for the 23-day delay satisfactory.
Notice of Motion for condonation of delay in filing the accompanying appeal allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16nma444-18.odt
spb/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 444 OF 2018 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L.) NO. 152 OF 2017
The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur Commissionerate … Applicant.
In the matter between :
The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur Commissionerte … Appellant.
V/s.
PFIZER Ltd., … Respondent.
Mr. Sham Walve, Advocate, a/w. Mr. Nikhil Wadikar for the Applicant / Appellant.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA And RIYAZ IQBAL CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 07, 2018
PC :
1 None appears for the Respondent despite service of
notice.
Digitally signed Shalikram by ShalikramPralhadrao Pralhadrao Borey Borey Date:2018.09.11 18:49:18 +0530
2 This Motion seeks condonation of 23 days delay in filing the appeal from the order dated 11.04.2017 passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai.
1/2
Borey
16nma444-18.odt
spb/
3 We have perused the affidavit dated 23.03.2018 in support of the notice of motion filed by Mr. Babulal Meena, Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise. We are satisfied with the reasons indicated therein for the delay in filing the accompanying appeal from the order dated 11.04.2017.
4 Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(RIYAZ IQBAL CHAGLA,J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
2/2
Borey
Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur Commissionerate
PFIZER Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz Iqbal Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
