This appeal, filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was dismissed as withdrawn following a circular directing revenue to withdraw appeals with a tax effect under Rs. 50 Lakhs.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-CEXAL-318-15.doc
Sharayu Khot .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 318 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Service Tax-I …Appellant Mumbai
Versus
AMP Capital Advisors (I) Pvt.Ltd. …Respondent
Ms. P.S. Cardozo, i/by Neelesh Kalantri, for the Appellant.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 11 September 2018
ORDER :
SharayuPandurangKhot Digitally signedby SharayuPandurangKhotDate:2018.09.1215:04:45 +1200
1944 challenges the order dated 16th April 2015 passed by
Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
1 / 2
September 11, 2018
903-CEXAL-318-15.doc
issued by the Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs directs the Revenue not to file fresh Appeals and also withdraw the pending Appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs. 50.00 Lakhs.
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.] [M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
2 / 2
September 11, 2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Commissioner of Service Tax-I
AMP Capital Advisors (I) Pvt. Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
