In Central Excise Appeal No. 134 of 2017, the High Court dismissed the appeal by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Daman, as it was withdrawn by the appellant's counsel.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5-CEXA-134-2017.DOC
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 134 OF 2017
Commissioner of Service Tax – I, Daman … Appellant Versus Hi Tech Office Systems …Respondent
Ms. P.S. Cardozo with Ms. Ruju Thakkar for the Appellant.
CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATED: 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2018
PC:- 1. This Appeal under Section 83 of the Finance Act read with Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 challenges the order dated 7th April, 2014 passed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
1/2
5-CEXA-134-2017.DOC
Commissioner, (Legal), Daman Commissionerate seeks to withdraw this Appeal.
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Commissioner of Service Tax – I, Daman
Hi Tech Office Systems
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court